Nash Parish Council

Minutes of the Meeting of Nash Parish Council held on Thursday 16 July 2009 at 7.30pm in the Village Hall.

 

Present:            Cllr A Taylor (Chairman), Cllr G F Culverhouse, Cllr Dewhurst, ,Cllr D Gillow, Cllr C G Tomkins, Cllr E Watts .

Apologies:        Cllr Sir John Southby Bt

In Attendance:         Mrs M S Hedges (Clerk), Cllr Janet Blake (Chair, AVDC) was present for the presentation recorded in Minute 19.

 

19. Presentation to Cllr Christopher Tomkins

Cllr Janet Blake, Chairman of Aylesbury Vale District Council, attended the meeting to make a presentation to Cllr Christopher Tomkins in recognition of his outstanding service to the community through his chairmanship of Nash Parish Council for thirty-nine years.

 

20. Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting on 21 May 2009

The Minutes of the meeting held on 21 May 2009 were approved and signed.

 

21. Matters arising from the Minutes

(i)                 Bollards in Thornborough Road (Minute 10):  The Council was informed that BCC had responded as follows: “The encroachment onto the verge by the new buildings gardens has been licensed as an authorised use of the verge and unfortunately, this cannot be changed without various parties consent and is out of my control. As you stated the bollards were installed at the request of the police and a bollard was chosen that would at least try and blend with the area from the limited supply we have available to us at short notice and regrettably I could not justify changing these bollards.”

 

22. Finance

(i)          Payments authorised/approved:  The following payments were authorised/ approved:

a)   NJ Blackwell Garden Services: Grass Cutting May 09                           £220.62

b)   EON: Street Lighting Maintenance                                                              £41.25

c)   Playsafety Ltd: Annual Inspection Report                                                    £78.00

d)   EON: Electrity Supply May 09                                                                      £29.12

e)   Mrs Hedges: Refund of CGT  present                                                       £103.98

f)     EON Energy Services Ltd: replace faulty street light                                 £27.00

g)   NJ Blackwell Garden Services: Grass Cutting June 09                          £254.93

h)   Jean Driver: duck food                                                                                    £8.29

i)EON: Electrity Supply June 09                                                                        £29.12

 

(ii)        Financial position:  Mrs Hedges reported that the funds in the Parish Council accounts were:

Current Account                                                                      £429.42

General Reserve                                                                 £3,057.58

Recreation Ground Reserve                                              £2,651.20

                      Total                                                                 £6,138.20

 

(iii)      Requests for donations: Mrs Hedges reported requests from the Winslow Community Bus and Vitalise.  After noting that NPC had given £50 annually to the Community Bus since 2004, the Council agreed to make a further donation of £50.  After noting that Vitalise provided respite breaks for disabled people and that, for a number of years, NPC had made a donation of £25, the Council agreed to make a further donation of £25.

(iv)      Annual accounts of village societies:  Mrs Hedges reported that she had inspected copies of the accounts of the Elmer’s charity, the Allotment Committee, and the Village Hall and they appeared to be in order. As Mrs Hedges was Treasurer of the Church, the Chairman had inspected the church accounts and they were in order. The accounts of the Youth Club for the year ending 31 July 2008 were still awaited.

(v)        Audit:  Mrs Hedges reported that the Audit papers had been submitted by the due date of 30 June, and that the period when residents could inspect the accounts was now in progress.

23. Planning

(i)      New applications: The Council noted the following new applications and the comments it had made on them:

a)  09/00647/AGD  Land west of Stratford Road , Nash: Erection of agricultural building and area of hard standing: No objection, provided it is used only for agricultural or equestrian purposes.

b)  09/00812/ALB  Church Farm 4 Stratford Road : Removal of render to expose existing building: No objection

c)  09/00744/APP  3 Wood End: Erection of summerhouse: No objection

d)  09/00983/APP& 09/00985/ACD  Land at 1 Wood End : Demolition of existing building and erection of detached two storey dwelling.  

Nash Parish Council regrets that an old building will be replaced by a new building but will offer no objection on the understanding that:

            · As many of the old bricks as possible are re-used

            · Where new bricks are used they should be as similar as possible.

            · Window frames and door frames should be of wood (not UPVC)

· The development of the site will be sympathetic to the environs of the Pond and Wood End as this is part of the Nash Conservation Area and Nash Village Pond is a key asset of the village.

· On a practical level of parking, the site should be landscaped to contain space for at least four cars to prevent any blocking of Wood End for farm and emergency vehicles. Because of the very limited bus service most Nash households have a car for each adult member of the family so four cars for a household (parents and two adult children) is not uncommon. Three adults with cars plus visitors’ cars (possibly overnight) are very common.

· During building work, care is taken to avoid damaging the Pond environs and the Village Green and to leave the Green as a safe children’s play area.   NPC would expect all vehicles and materials to be on site during the construction work, with no parking on the verge or blocking of Wood End.  If any damage is caused NPC would expect it to be made good.

 

e)  09/01128/AHR  Land adjacent Whaddon Road : Removal of hedgerow: This is a considerable amount of hedging that would be removed.  Nash Parish Council would regret the removal of the hedgerows but does not believe that it has valid grounds for objecting.

The Council noted further that the removal of the hedgerows would facilitate “prairie farming” and that NPC would regret changes to the Whaddon Chase landscape, which had been largely unaltered for many hundreds of years.  The Council would have preferred the “gappy” hedges to be replanted.  In future, the Chairman agreed that Cllr Watts should be one of the councillors consulted on “agricultural” applications in which he did not have an interest. Mrs Hedges said that she had reported NPC’s comments to the Chairman of Whaddon Parish Council.

f)    09/01156/ATC:  Church Farm 4 Stratford Road: Works to maple tree: No objection

(ii)    Applications approved: The Council noted that the following applications had been approved.

a) 09/00206/AOP Yew Tree Farm Whaddon Road  Erection of two storey farm dwelling and access

b) 09/00647/AGD  Land west of Stratford Road , Nash: Erection of agricultural building and area of hard standing

c) 09/00622/APP  Little Acre, 11 Winslow Road & 09/00656/ALB  Little Acre , 11 Winslow Road :: Erection of two storey side extension, porch and detached garage- amendment to planning approval 06/02134/APP

d) 09/00812/ALB  Church Farm 4 Stratford Road : Removal of render to expose existing building

(iii)  Other planning matters:

a) Winslow Green (Minute 7(i)(a)): The Council noted that the developers had decided not to appeal against AVDC’s decision to refuse this application.

b) AVDC: Proposed Submission Core Strategy: Local Development Framework June 2009: The Council noted that it had been invited to comment on this document, the closing date for which was 22 July 2009.  Cllr Culverhouse reported on the huge amount of work involved for Aylesbury Vale in preparing this document.  At this stage, Nash was not directly affected as the proposals concentrated on the main growth areas although “other rural settlements”, while being protected, would be expected to absorb a small number of additional houses.  The North Bucks Parishes Planning Consortium (NBPPC) had met and would be submitting a detailed response – the main issues being the location of the expansion of Aylesbury, technical issues relation to the Salden Chase development at Newton Longville, and the housing development in Buckingham and Winslow.  The Council agreed that its contribution to the consultation came through its participation in the preparation of the NBPPC response.  Mrs Hedges would submit a short response as advised by Cllr Culverhouse who was thanked for his work.

c)   Milton Keynes Partnership:  Eastern and Western Stakeholders Groups Questionnaire: Cllr Gillow reported that this group enabled all those involved to make a contribution to the various developments in Milton Keynes .  Graham Stewart of Whaddon attended these and alerted Cllr Gillow if there were matters of interest or concern to Nash.  Cllr Gillow had completed this survey on behalf of the Council, drawing attention again to our concern about traffic through the village.

d) Partial Review of the Regional Spatial Strategy for the South East: Provision for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople: Recommendations for new Policy H7: The Council noted that this document had been circulated with a closing date for comments of 1 September 2009.  The Council noted the problems of reconciling the need for there to be provision for gypsies, travellers and travelling showpeople, with the reluctance of many people to live close to such sites.  Cllr Watts suggested that the Council needed a plan to protect the village when land came up for sale.  Cllr Culverhouse and the Clerk were asked to consider what response NPC should make, both in connection with this consultation and the response to the AVDC Local Development Framework.

 

24. Milton Keynes Expansion/North Bucks Parishes Planning Consortium:

Cllr Culverhouse reported that the NBPPC had discussed the SE Plan and written to BCC to say that the next review of growth tests and studies (as required by the SE Plan) should not be time-constrained and should cover a twenty-five year period to 2050 and beyond. Underlying this belief was the fact that short time-frames would rule out development east of the M1, in a way that longer time-frames would not.

 

25. CPRE

Cllr Culverhouse said that CPRE, in its response to the Local Development Framework, was challenging the over emphasis on new development sites rather than the redevelopment of existing sites. CPRE was also querying whether the increase in jobs would be comparable with the increase in housing and so prevent the new developments being largely “dormitory housing”.

 

26. Recreation Ground and other maintenance

(i)      Play area safety inspection report:  Mrs Hedges tabled a summary of the ROSPA inspection report.  There was one item that required prompt attention, namely the replacement of the chains on the junior swings.  The Council approved the purchase of replacement chains and shackles from Wicksteed at a cost of £236.10 (ex VAT).  Cllr Southby had offered to fit them.

(ii)    Notices, Safety Surfaces, Ivy:  Mrs Hedges reported that Cllr Southby was satisfied that there were sufficient notices in the Play Area.  She had removed the ivy from the Churchyard Wall and had gained Mrs Chapman’s approval for the removal of the ivy from the Recreation Ground side of the Old Schoolhouse wall.  Blackwell’s had been asked for a quote to remove the moss and were being chased for it.

(iii)  Hedge on the west side of the Recreation Ground. The Council agreed that this hedge should be cut – it was thick enough and so did not require to be laid. The Council agreed to ask Mr Ian Watts to cut the hedge – Cllr Watts declared an interest.

(iv)  Moving and refurbishing the Notice Board by the Village hall:  Cllr Gillow reported that, as part of the summer works at the Village Hall, NVHC wished to move the Notice Board so that it no longer blocked the vision of cars turning right out of the car park.  The Council agreed that the Notice Board should be moved at the Village Hall’s expense. The Council further agreed to accept a quotation for £75 for the repainting of the Notice Board by Mr Quainton, who would be undertaking other painting work in the Village Hall during August.

(v)    Nash Village Picnic: Mrs Hedges reported that this event, organised by NVHC, had been advertised for 6 September in the Recreation Ground although no formal request for the use of the Recreation Ground had been received. The Council agreed that, assuming such a formal request was received, it was willing to approve the event on the basis that:

· The Village Hall Insurance would cover the event

· NPC would ask Blackwell’s to cut the grass cut a week before the event but leave the cuttings on the field

· NVHC would carry out a risk assessment

· The Recreation ground would not be closed to the public, and the gate would be opened only to allow a small number of vehicles in and then would be locked again.

 

(vi)  Moles: Mrs Hedges reported that there was evidence of mole activity in the Play Area.  The Council agreed to ask the “mole man” back to catch them.

 

27. Replacement Street Light: Mrs Hedges reported that, following routine maintenance on Nash street lights, an EON engineer enquired whether NPC wished to replace more of the street lights with the energy efficient ones that switch off at mid-night. Cllr Gillow reported that it appeared that Mr Meardon had put black tape on light No 7 outside no 24B in the High Street to reduce the glare for his astronomy. Mrs Hedges reported that Cllr Southby had suggested that NPC replace this light now at a cost of £240 (ex VAT) with an estimated payback period of 3 years.  After noting that this would mean that all the lights in the High Street went out at mid-night, the Council agreed to approve this expenditure.

 

The Council noted that, after this replacement, there would still be eight of the “old” lights in the village and agreed to consider replacing two a year for the next four years when NPC next prepared its budget.

 

28. Buckinghamshire County Council

(i)      Buckingham Local Area Forum 25 June: Cllr Gillow spoke to his circulated note.

a) Community First Responder: The Council agreed that it would be a good idea to have “Community First Responder” in the village who might be able to administer first aid (and save a life) before an ambulance was able to respond to a 999 call. It was hoped that an article would be included in the next Newsletter.

b) North End of the High Street (Minute 10):  Cllr Gillow reported that, after the meeting and after consultation, BCC had decided to withdraw the £19k allocated for a pavement at the North end of the Nash High Street, but, as an alternative, would commit revenue funding to carry out sett kerbing to protect the verges that had been eroded. The work would be carried out in the current financial year.

c) Area 14 Speed Review:  Cllr Gillow reported that the Area 14 Speed Review would now take place in Spring 2010. From the work on the Area 12 Speed Review, it appeared that there would be a 30mph speed limit within each village as well as a 40mph speed limit on a straight stretch of road just outside a village so that cars were already travelling more slowly when they reached a village sign.   Although there was a case for having 20mph speed limits outside schools, it was understood that BCC was not considering 20mph speed limits as part of these reviews because they usually required traffic calming or other measures as well.

 

(ii)    Signposts: Mrs Hedges reported that the village sign on the Beachampton Road had been straightened but the road sign for Little Horwood at the junction at the south end of the village had still not been replaced.

(iii)  Consultation exercise: Planning on Policy Obligations for Education Provision: Cllr Dewhurst summarised the policy that BCC was proposing to adopt in relation to seeking developer contributions towards additional educational infrastructure.   After consultation with former colleagues she had suggested three substantive points that should be made and these, which were set out in the circulated paper, had been submitted.

(iv)  Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Plan: NPC had been represented at all three workshops.  Councillors would have found it easier to contribute if there had been more information in advance of the workshops.  The Council was generally supportive of what BCC was seeking to achieve and noted that the next round of Workshops was on 17 and 19 September.

(v)    Buckingham Hospital : NPC noted the submission made by BCC and noted that the PCT had deferred a decision.

 

29. Buckinghamshire Association of Local Councils: Matters Arising

The Council received copies of the publication.

 

30. Aylesbury Vale District Council

(i)          Village Freighter Service:  NPC noted that the Freighter service had visited on 9 July.

(ii)        Visit of “TUFFS” (Turn up for Free Sports), 23 July : Mrs Hedges reported that she had got a phone call out of the blue to check arrangements for this event – it was the first she, or the Village Hall, had heard of it but AVDC had advertised it in a leaflet given out in schools.  AVDC were conducting 45 games sessions for children of 11 or over and had put Nash down for 10-12 on 23 July.  Mrs Hedges reported that Cllr Southby would arrange for the Village Hall toilets to be open.  AVDC would provide two people to lead games – football/ cricket/ rounders etc.  They would not require vehicular access to the Recreation Ground. The event had been publicised at the recent Barn Dance and Mrs Firth would be asked to circulate Youth Club parents.  NPC was grateful that activities were being provided for children in the villages but expressed concern that the Council had not been consulted in advance.

(iii)      Visit of Children’s entertainer (Minute 13(ii)): The Council noted that Cllr Gillow had prepared the risk assessment and would publicise this event.

 

31. Letter from Mr & Mrs Harwood  (Cllr Tomkins declared an interest.)

The Council discussed the letter from Mr and Mrs Harwood about the problems they experienced if the gate on the bridal path next the Winslow Road was left open.

The Council took the view:

· that the gate should only be open for the limited amount of time necessary to allow people, cars and horses through the gate;

· that the position of the gate made it dangerous for cars to stop between the gate and the road when going along the bridle path.  If the gate were to be set back from the road, then cars could park safely next the road and reduce the time the gate needed to be open.

· that the gate should be fitted with a self closing mechanism so that, unless it was fixed open (e.g. to let a car through) the gate would close of its own accord.  This would stop the problem if any walkers or riders using the gate failed to close it properly.

After discussion, the Council agreed to ask the Wyke family, as those living closest to the gate if they would close the gate any time they noticed that it had been left open.  In addition, the Council agreed to ask Mr and Mrs Harwood to consider moving the gate and fitting a self-closing mechanism as the Council believed that this would considerably reduce the problem.  Mrs Hedges was asked to write to the Wykes and the Harwoods on these lines, and to put a note in the next Newsletter asking residents to be sure to close the gate.

 

32. Dates of meetings:  The Council noted that the dates of the remaining meetings in 2009/10 were:  17 September; 19 November 2009; 21 January 2010; 18 March 2010; with the Annual Parish Meeting on 13 May 2010.

 

After noting that the next meeting of the Council on 17 September would clash with the meeting of Bucks Local Area Forum and with the evening Workshop for the Whaddon Chase Green Infrastructure Plan, the Council agreed to postpone the September meeting for a week to 24 September.

 

There being no further business the meeting closed at 9.15 p.m.

 

 

MH.20.07.2009